Him: Do you know what my dream is?
Me: What.
Him: To play strip chess with a girl and when I win I fuck her.
Me: What if she wins?
Him: What? I win.
Me: No but what if she wins? She should get to do something like kill you or punch you in the face.
Him: It’s a fantasy.
Me: I know it’s a fantasy — I’m not expecting you to drop me off at the airport and then do that. But a fantasy can still have logic.
Him: Okay. If I win I fuck her if she wins she fucks me.
Advertisements
Actual conversation??
The dominance psychology lurks out to me – the urge to have an understandable system (chess) compared to a myriad complex (to the point of deliberate obfuscation) social system between him and fulfillment of a strong primal urge. And the dumbness of that urge, even as it uses an understandable system (chess) to make a realization of its goal is not able to grasp an alternate outcome which is inherently part of that system, ie failing to win at chess (which should be understandable).
I wonder if he voted for Trump? I’m not saying that to be mean – I can commiserate with the above psychology. And it’s the sort of psychology to get played – offering understandable, simple systems to needy base urges which don’t consider those simple systems can have a very different outcome.
absolutely actual. I wondered about politics too but didn’t bring it up.
‘mazin’. I thought a taxi driver who went on about the letterbox he designed was a bit extreme. Australian taxi drivers are comparatively tame, though.
Him: Me: Him: Me: Him: Me: Stop the cab.